{"id":724,"date":"2013-03-25T09:25:25","date_gmt":"2013-03-25T09:25:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rulesofreason.wordpress.com\/?p=724"},"modified":"2013-03-25T09:25:25","modified_gmt":"2013-03-25T09:25:25","slug":"the-failure-of-political-science","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/re-design.dimiter.eu\/?p=724","title":{"rendered":"The failure of political science"},"content":{"rendered":"

Last week the American Senate\u00a0supported<\/a> with a clear bi-partisan majority a decision to stop funding for political science research from the National Science Foundation. Of all disciplines, only political science has been singled out<\/a> for the cuts and the money will go for cancer research instead.<\/p>\n

The decision is obviously wrong for so many reasons<\/a> but my point is different. How could political scientists who are supposed to understand better than anyone else how politics works allow this to happen? What does it tell us about the state of the discipline that the academic experts in political analysis cannot prevent overt political action that hurts them directly and rather severely?<\/p>\n

To me, this failure of American political scientists to protect their own turf in the political game is scandalous. It is as bad as\u00a0Nobel-winning economists Robert Merton and Myron Scholes leading the hedge fund ‘Long Tern Capital Management<\/a>‘ to bust and losing 4.6 billion dollars with the help of their Nobel-wining economic theories. As Myron & Scholes’ hedge fund story revels the true real-world value of (much) financial economics theories, so does the humiliation of political science by the Congress reveal the true real-world value of (much) political theories. <\/span><\/p>\n

Think about it – \u00a0the world-leading academic specialists on collective action, interest representation and mobilization could not get themselves mobilized, organized and represented in Washington to protect their funding. The professors of the political process and legislative institutions could not find a way to work these same institutions to their own advantage. The experts on political preferences and incentives did not see the broad bi-partisan coalition against political science forming. That’s\u00a0<\/span>embarrassing!\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

It is even more\u00a0embarrassing\u00a0because American political science is<\/strong> the most productive, innovative, and competitive in the world. There is no doubt that almost all of the best new ideas, methods, and theories in political science over the last 50 years have come from the US. (And a lot of these innovations have been made possible because of the funding received by the National Science Foundation). So it is not that individual American political scientists are not smart – of course they are, but for some reason as a collective body they have not been able to benefit from their own knowledge and insights. Or that knowledge and insights about US politics are\u00a0deficient\u00a0in\u00a0important\u00a0ways.The fact remains, political scientists were beaten in what should have been their own game. Hopefully some kind of lesson will emerge from all that…<\/p>\n

P.S. No reason for public administration, sociology and other related\u00a0disciplines to be smug about pol sci’s humiliation – they have been saved (for now) mostly by their own irrelevance.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Last week the American Senate\u00a0supported with a clear bi-partisan majority a decision to stop funding for political science research from the National Science Foundation. Of all disciplines, only political science has been singled out for the cuts and the money will go for cancer research instead. The decision is obviously wrong for so many reasons but my point is different. How could political scientists who are supposed to understand better than anyone else how politics works allow this to happen? What does it tell us about the state of the discipline that the academic experts in political analysis cannot prevent overt political action that hurts them directly and rather severely? To me, this failure of American political scientists to protect their own turf in the political game is scandalous. It is as bad as\u00a0Nobel-winning economists Robert Merton and Myron Scholes leading the hedge fund ‘Long Tern Capital Management‘ to bust and losing 4.6 billion dollars with the help of their Nobel-wining economic theories. As Myron & Scholes’ hedge fund story revels the true real-world value of (much) financial economics theories, so does the humiliation of political science by the Congress reveal the true real-world value of (much) political theories. Think about it – \u00a0the world-leading academic specialists on collective action, interest representation and mobilization could not get themselves mobilized, organized and represented in Washington to protect their funding. The professors of the political process and legislative institutions could not find a way to work these same institutions to their own…<\/p>\n

Continue readingThe failure of political science<\/span><\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false},"categories":[41,44],"tags":[282,444,497,498,500,563,652],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p7g3hj-bG","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":463,"url":"http:\/\/re-design.dimiter.eu\/?p=463","url_meta":{"origin":724,"position":0},"title":"Cutting funds for political science research","date":"May 11, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"Just wanted to pass along this\u00a0troubling piece of news: In the US, the\u00a0House has voted to abolish funding for political science from the National Science Foundation altogether, and\u00a0to cut the American Community Survey - an in-depth representative survey providing data to policy makers (education, housing, etc). The Dark Ages are\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Science politicisation"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":436,"url":"http:\/\/re-design.dimiter.eu\/?p=436","url_meta":{"origin":724,"position":1},"title":"Models in Political Science","date":"April 9, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"Inside Higher Ed has a good interview with David Primo and Kevin Clarke on their new book A Model Discipline: Political Science and the Logic of Representations.\u00a0 The book and the interview criticize the hypothetico-deductive tradition in social science: The actual research was prompted by a student who asked, \"Why\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Observational studies"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":32,"url":"http:\/\/re-design.dimiter.eu\/?p=32","url_meta":{"origin":724,"position":2},"title":"The 'Nobel' prize for Economics, VAR and Political Science","date":"October 11, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"Yesterday the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel\u00a0 was awarded to the economists Thomas J. Sargent and\u00a0Christopher A. Sims \"for their empirical research on cause and effect in the macroeconomy\" (press-release here, Tyler Cowen presented the laureates here and here). The award for Christopher Sims\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Bibliometry"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":647,"url":"http:\/\/re-design.dimiter.eu\/?p=647","url_meta":{"origin":724,"position":3},"title":"New data source for political science researchers","date":"December 19, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"Political Data Yearbook Interactive\u00a0is a new source for data on election results, turnout and government composition for all EU and some non-European countries. It is basically an online version of the yearbooks that ECPR printed as part of the European Journal for Political Research for many years now. The interactive\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Data visualization"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":11,"url":"http:\/\/re-design.dimiter.eu\/?p=11","url_meta":{"origin":724,"position":4},"title":"Rules of Reason, Reasons of Rules","date":"October 6, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"This blog is about the uses of abuses of research on public policy and administration. It is about the Rules of Reason - the rules that guide the production of social science and that structure the design of academic research. But it is also about the Reasons of Rules -\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Mission statement"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1028,"url":"http:\/\/re-design.dimiter.eu\/?p=1028","url_meta":{"origin":724,"position":5},"title":"Government positions from party-level Manifesto data (with R)","date":"January 31, 2019","format":false,"excerpt":"In empirical research in political science and public policy, we often need estimates of the political positions of governments (cabinets) and the salience of different issues for different governments (cabinets). Data on policy positions and issue salience is available, but typically at the level of political parties. One prominent source\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Measurement"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/re-design.dimiter.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/724"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/re-design.dimiter.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/re-design.dimiter.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/re-design.dimiter.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/re-design.dimiter.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=724"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/re-design.dimiter.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/724\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/re-design.dimiter.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=724"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/re-design.dimiter.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=724"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/re-design.dimiter.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=724"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}