{"id":467,"date":"2012-05-15T10:39:20","date_gmt":"2012-05-15T10:39:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rulesofreason.wordpress.com\/?p=467"},"modified":"2012-05-15T10:39:20","modified_gmt":"2012-05-15T10:39:20","slug":"co-decision-and-decision-making-speed-in-the-eu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/re-design.dimiter.eu\/?p=467","title":{"rendered":"Co-decision and decision-making speed in the EU"},"content":{"rendered":"

Our paper<\/a> (with Anne Rasmussen<\/a>) on the influence of early agreements (trilogues) on the speed of decision making in the EU has just been published by the European Integration Online Papers <\/a>(EIoP). The abstract is below. Anne blogged about the findings here<\/a>. \u00a0<\/p>\n

Abstract<\/a>: <\/strong>The increased use of early agreements in the EU co-decision procedure raises the concern that intra and inter-institutional political debate is sacrificed for the sake of efficiency. We investigate the effect of early agreements (trilogues) on the time it takes for legislation to be negotiated during the first reading of co-decision. We find that the first reading negotiations of trilogues on salient legislation take longer than first readings of similar files reconciled at second and third reading. First readings of early agreements also appear to last longer when considering all co-decision files submitted to the 5th and 6th\u00a0European Parliaments, but the effect is masked by a general increase in first reading duration after 2004. We conclude that even if early agreements restrict access of certain actors to decision making, they allow for more time for substantive debate at the first reading stage than similar files reconciled later in the legislative process.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

By the way, let me use the occasion to congratulate EIoP<\/a> for being one of the very few free<\/strong>\u00a0 and rigorously peer-reviewed<\/strong>, SSCI<\/a>-indexed, journals. All articles are available online without a subscription and without a registration. While many people talk against the gated and hugely expensive academic journals, very few authors actually support the free alternatives by submitting to and reviewing for them.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Our paper (with Anne Rasmussen) on the influence of early agreements (trilogues) on the speed of decision making in the EU has just been published by the European Integration Online Papers (EIoP). The abstract is below. Anne blogged about the findings here. \u00a0 Abstract: The increased use of early agreements in the EU co-decision procedure raises the concern that intra and inter-institutional political debate is sacrificed for the sake of efficiency. We investigate the effect of early agreements (trilogues) on the time it takes for legislation to be negotiated during the first reading of co-decision. We find that the first reading negotiations of trilogues on salient legislation take longer than first readings of similar files reconciled at second and third reading. First readings of early agreements also appear to last longer when considering all co-decision files submitted to the 5th and 6th\u00a0European Parliaments, but the effect is masked by a general increase in first reading duration after 2004. We conclude that even if early agreements restrict access of certain actors to decision making, they allow for more time for substantive debate at the first reading stage than similar files reconciled later in the legislative process. By the way, let me use the occasion to congratulate EIoP for being one of the very few free\u00a0 and rigorously peer-reviewed, SSCI-indexed, journals. All articles are available online without a subscription and without a registration. While many people talk against the gated and hugely expensive academic journals, very few authors actually support the free…<\/p>\n

Continue readingCo-decision and decision-making speed in the EU<\/span><\/a><\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"spay_email":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_is_tweetstorm":false},"categories":[23,37],"tags":[134,156,170,199,214,243,247,341,362,379,381,454],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p7g3hj-7x","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":711,"url":"http:\/\/re-design.dimiter.eu\/?p=711","url_meta":{"origin":467,"position":0},"title":"Interest groups and the making of legislation","date":"March 6, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"How are the activities of interest groups related to the making of legislation? Does mobilization of interest groups lead to more legislation in the future? Alternatively, does the adoption of new policies motivate interest groups to get active? Together with Dave Lowery, Brendan Carroll and Joost Berkhout, we tackle these\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "EU governance"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":720,"url":"http:\/\/re-design.dimiter.eu\/?p=720","url_meta":{"origin":467,"position":1},"title":"The evolution of EU legislation (graphed with ggplot2 and R)","date":"March 19, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"During the last half century the European Union has adopted more than 100 000 pieces of legislation. In this presentation I look into the patterns of legislative adoption over time. I tried to create clear and engaging graphs that provide some insight into the evolution of law-making activity: not an\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Data visualization"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/www.dimiter.eu\/thumb\/figure1.png?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":93,"url":"http:\/\/re-design.dimiter.eu\/?p=93","url_meta":{"origin":467,"position":2},"title":"More than you ever wanted to know about compliance with EU law in Europe","date":"October 27, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"I \u00a0spent the last week finalizing a \u00a0review of the literature \u00a0on compliance with EU \u00a0law at the national level. It was a rather masochistic experience which I had promised \u00a0myself never to repeat but alas... This time at least somebody will take note it since I am going to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Policy implementation"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":901,"url":"http:\/\/re-design.dimiter.eu\/?p=901","url_meta":{"origin":467,"position":3},"title":"Is there an East-West divide in the European Union?","date":"March 31, 2017","format":false,"excerpt":"From the way the media reports on European Union negotiations, it is easy to get the impression that there is a rift between East and West European member states, and that the enlargement of the EU \u00a0has compromised the EU's\u00a0decision-making capacity. In a text published at the EUROPP blog, I\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "EU governance"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/re-design.dimiter.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/co-voting-networks-1024x510.png?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":616,"url":"http:\/\/re-design.dimiter.eu\/?p=616","url_meta":{"origin":467,"position":4},"title":"The most successful party family in Europe?!","date":"December 5, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"\"The populist radical right constitutes the most successful party family in postwar Western Europe.\" (Cas Mudde, Stein Rokkan Lecture published in the latest issue of the European Journal of Political Research) I hope this is a typo or some other type of unintentional misunderstanding. How can the populist radical right\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Voting and elections"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":230,"url":"http:\/\/re-design.dimiter.eu\/?p=230","url_meta":{"origin":467,"position":5},"title":"Hyperlinks","date":"January 18, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"Migration and unemployment File under 'correlation is not causation'. And 'endogeneity'. And 'instrumental variables that do not make sense'. Equitable decision making has intrinsic value\u00a0Apparently,there is a region in the brain [anterior insula] 'linked to the experience of subjective disutility'. Ah,\u00a0the prospects for utility maximization! Fukuyama on European identities\u00a0Surfing on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Hyperlinks"","img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/re-design.dimiter.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/467"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/re-design.dimiter.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/re-design.dimiter.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/re-design.dimiter.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/re-design.dimiter.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=467"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/re-design.dimiter.eu\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/467\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/re-design.dimiter.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=467"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/re-design.dimiter.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=467"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/re-design.dimiter.eu\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=467"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}